Erratum to: Sellarsian Behaviorism, Davidsonian Interpretivism, and First Person Authority
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Davidson, first-person authority, and the evidence for semantics
Donald Davidson aims to illuminate the concept of meaning by asking: what knowledge would suffice to put one in a position to understand the speech of another, and what evidence sufficiently distant from the concepts to be illuminated could in principle ground such knowledge? Davidson answers: knowledge of an appropriate truth-theory for the speaker’s language, grounded in what sentences the sp...
متن کاملFrom mechanistic to functional behaviorism.
A shift from mechanistic behaviorism to functional behaviorism is presented against the background of two historical traditions, one with an emphasis on form, the other with an emphasis on function. Skinner's work, which made more contributions to a functional behaviorism than to a mechanistic behaviorism, exemplifies this shift. The two traditions and an account of Skinner's development of fun...
متن کاملMerging second-person and first-person neuroscience.
Schilbach et al. contrast second-person and third-person approaches to social neuroscience. We discuss relations between second-person and first-person approaches, arguing that they cannot be studied in isolation. Contingency is central for converging first- and second-person approaches. Studies of embodiment show how contingencies scaffold first-person perspective and how the transition from a...
متن کاملUS probes first apparent non-sexual person-to-person Zika transmission and first domestic outbreak.
A Utah man who cared for an elderly male relative infected with Zika virus has tested positive for the disease, despite not traveling to any known Zika zone. The case has raised new questions about how the disease may spread. It came in a week when the first apparent US case from local mosquito bite appeared in Florida, and a week after the first report of female-to-male sexual transmission in ...
متن کاملFaith, Fact, and Behaviorism.
David Hume argued that ought cannot be derived from is. That is, no set of facts, no amount of scientific knowledge, is by itself sufficient to urge us to action. Yet generations of well-meaning scientists (more and more as secular influences grow in the West) seem to have forgotten Hume's words of wisdom. All motivated action depends ultimately on beliefs that cannot be proved by the methods o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Philosophia
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0048-3893,1574-9274
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-013-9503-9